Abstract
Background: The outcome of Chagas disease patients after receiving implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is still controversial. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes after ICD implantation in patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) and ischemic heart disease (IHD). Methods: Prospective study of a population of 153 patients receiving ICD (65 with CCC and 88 with IHD). The devices were implanted between 2003 and 2011. Survival rates and event-free survival were compared. Results: The groups were similar regarding sex, functional class and ejection fraction. Ischemic patients were, on average, 10 years older than CCC patients (p < 0.05). Patients with CCC had lower schooling and monthly income than IHD patients (p < 0.05). The number of appropriate therapies was 2.07 higher in CCC patients, who had a greater incidence of appropriate shock (p < 0.05). Annual mortality rate and electrical storm incidence were similar in both groups. There was no sudden death in CCC patients, and only one in IHD patients. Neither survival time (p = 0.720) nor event-free survival (p = 0.143) significantly differed between the groups. Conclusion: CCC doubles the risk of receiving appropriate therapies as compared to IHD, showing the greater complexity of arrhythmias in Chagas patients.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Pereira, F. T. M., Rocha, E. A., Monteiro, M. de P. M., Lima, N. de A., Rodrigues Sobrinho, C. R. M., & Pires Neto, R. da J. (2016). Clinical course after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: Chagasic versus ischemic patients. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, 107(2), 99–105. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20160101
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.