Reporting in agile portfolio management: Routines, metrics and artefacts to maintain an effective oversight

7Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In a world where the speed of change is faster than ever, a growing number of organisations adopts Agile Portfolio Management (APM) to connect their agile teams to business strategy. A domain which has been little explored in literature and professional frameworks. Based on 14 interviews conducted in 10 large European organisations, in this paper we report the preliminary results of our study on reporting routines, artefacts and metrics in Agile Portfolio Management. In our findings we discuss the three generic domains of reporting responsibility and the novel types of reporting routines found in practice. Further, we use the concept of boundary objects to recommend which types of artefacts are effective for which reporting routines.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stettina, C. J., & Schoemaker, L. (2018). Reporting in agile portfolio management: Routines, metrics and artefacts to maintain an effective oversight. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol. 314, pp. 199–215). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91602-6_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free