Meta-analysis on the survival of short implants

38Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the success and failure rates of short implants (10 mm or less) for oral rehabilitations in cases of limited bone height. Study Design: Review of the articles published on the topic between the years 2000 and 2010, and development of a descriptive meta-analysis of the results. Results: The majority of the studies obtain a cumulative success rate (CSR) similar to that of longer implants (92.5% - 98.42% for machined and rough-surface implants, respectively). The studies that record lower cumulative success rates (CSR) are later studies that analyze implants with a machined surface. Almost none of the studi-es compared the success/failure rates with the bone quality or location of the implant (maxilla or mandible). Thus, the results obtained are from a mixture of these parameters. Conclusions: In view of the results analyzed, rehabilitations with short implants are a reliable treatment; however, the lack of consistency in the study designs as well as the presence of bias in all of the studies reviewed make it difficult to analyze the data. © Medicina Oral S. L.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Menchero-Cantalejo, E., Barona-Dorado, C., Cantero-Álvarez, M., Fernández-Cáliz, F., & Martínez-González, J. M. (2011, July). Meta-analysis on the survival of short implants. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.16.e546

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free