The efficacy of two trabecular bypass stents compared to one in the management of open-angle glaucoma

3Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the outcomes of combined cataract surgery with two trabecular microbypass stents compared to one in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Methods: Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma were included. Primary outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP), postoperative medications, and postoperative adverse events. Results: The average patient age was 73.2 years. Thirty-nine eyes had phacoemulsification and one stent implanted (Group 1); 30 eyes had phacoemulsification and two stents implanted (Group 2). A significant reduction in mean IOP from baseline to 12 months was noted for both Group 1 (16.67 ± 4.1 mm Hg to 14.45 ± 3.8 mm Hg; p < 0.0251) and Group 2 (18.33 ± 3.99 mm Hg to 14.31 ± 1.8 mm Hg; p < 0.0014). Group 2 had a greater percent decrease in IOP at 12 months than Group 1, but this difference was not statistically significant. Only Group 2 demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in medication burden at 12 months. There were no serious complications in either group thought to be caused by the microbypass stents. Conclusions: Both groups demonstrated a significant reduction in IOP at 12 months. Group 2 showed a greater percent decrease in IOP; however, it was not statistically significant. Only Group 2 demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in medication burden.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vlasov, A., & Kim, W. I. (2017). The efficacy of two trabecular bypass stents compared to one in the management of open-angle glaucoma. Military Medicine, 182, 222–225. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-16-00135

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free