Test and Re-Test Reliability of the Special Judo Fitness Test

  • Štefanovský M
  • Poliak M
  • Augustovičová D
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background. When analyzing the available literature, we found differences and considerable variability in the Special Judo Fitness Test (SJFT) reliability methods. Problems and Aim. For this reason, we have set our goal to determine the reliability and measurement error of all parameters by SJFT. Methods. The research sample consisted of 15 judo athletes (17.13 ± 1.96 years, body height 174.4 ± 10.64 cm, body weight 72 ± 15.37 kg) who trained in judo on average 8.73 ± 2.12 years in two different Slovak judo clubs. The results were processed using interclass correlation analysis and measurement error percentage. Results. Our results indicate poor reliability for HR 0 (α= 0.374, Err = 4.2 %) and moderate reliability for the following parameters: the number of throws in section A (α = 0.641, Err = 5.9 %), section B (α = 0.512, Err = 6.0 %), and section C (α = 0.644, Err = 5.9 %), respectively. Moderate reliability was also found for the total number of throws (α = 0.687, Err = 5.1 %). Good reliability was found for HR 1 ( α = 0797, Err = 3.5 %) and SJFT index ( α = 0.807, Err = 4.5 %). Conclusions. According to the results of this study, by testing the special level of judo fitness, as well as its changes, we recommend using the HR 1 and SJFT index as good reliable parameters.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Štefanovský, M., Poliak, M., Augustovičová, D., Kraček, S., & Hadža, R. (2021). Test and Re-Test Reliability of the Special Judo Fitness Test. Acta Facultatis Educationis Physicae Universitatis Comenianae, 61(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.2478/afepuc-2021-0009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free