Meatal stenosis after surgical correction of short frenulum: Is the 'pull-And-burn' method the way to go?

3Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The surgical correction of a short frenulum includes several procedures that vary in complexity of the technique and the use of stitches, lasers, or skin grafts. However, little is known about the effect of these procedures on meatal stenosis. A possible association of frenular artery trauma during circumcision and subsequent meatal stenosis has raised concerns regarding the importance of frenulum preservation. We hereby report our experience over 15 years of applying the 'pull-And-burn' method for short frenulum correction. Patients and Methods: A total of 236 patients underwent the 'pull-And-burn' procedure for short frenulum under local anesthesia on an outpatient basis between November 2002 and November 2017. The method is suture free and involves tearing the frenulum superficially and vertically by the aid of a low-power, high-frequency hyfrecator, avoiding the underlying frenular vessels. Patients were advised for a regular follow-up visit at 2-3 months postoperatively and were reviewed for symptoms and signs suggestive of meatal stenosis. Results: Follow-up files were available for 228 patients (96.6%). No symptoms suggestive of meatal stenosis (dysuria and stream pattern abnormalities) were reported by any patient. Examination of the urethral meatus revealed normal appearance, with no signs of edema or scarring in all the 228 patients. Conclusions: The 'pull-And-burn' method is a simple and safe procedure for the correction of short frenulum that respects anatomically the delicate vasculature of the frenular area, resulting in the preservation of the integrity of the urethral meatus.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gyftopoulos, K. I. (2018). Meatal stenosis after surgical correction of short frenulum: Is the “pull-And-burn” method the way to go? Urology Annals, 10(4), 354–357. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_25_18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free