Effectiveness of reducing infliximab dose interval in non-responder patients with refractory spondyloarthropathies. An open extension of a multicentre study

24Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective. To evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness of reducing the infliximab dose interval to 6 weeks in spondyloarthropathy patients not responding to 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks. Methods. After 30 weeks of infliximab therapy, 25 patients were classified as responders [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Activity Index (BASDAI) <4 cm or ESR <30 mm/h and CRP <5 mg/l, n=15; group A] or non-responders (patients who did not achieve the response established for group A; n=10; group B). Responders continued on 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks and non-responders decreased the dose interval to 6 weeks. BASDAI, Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), ESR, CRP and ankylosing spondylitis assessment (ASAS) criteria were used to assess response. Results. At 62 weeks, 11 of 15 patients (73.3%, 95% confidence interval = 44.9-92.2%) from group A and three of 10 patients (30%, 95% confidence interval = 6.7-65.2) from group B were responders (P=0.049). Eighty per cent (eight of 10 patients from group A) and 22.2% (two of 9 patients from group B) achieved 50% BASDAI improvement (P=0.023), and nine of 11 patients (81.8%) and four of 10 (40%) from groups A and B, respectively, reached ASAS20 at 62 weeks (P=0.08). Conclusion. Patients on infliximab 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks with persistent disease activity may benefit from reducing the dose interval to 6 weeks. © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Collantes-Estevez, E., Muñoz-Villanueva, M. C., Zarco, P., Torre-Alonso, J. C., Gratacós, J., González, C., … Cañete, J. D. (2005). Effectiveness of reducing infliximab dose interval in non-responder patients with refractory spondyloarthropathies. An open extension of a multicentre study. Rheumatology, 44(12), 1555–1558. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kei085

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free