A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data

6Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Statistical methods to tentatively identify differentially expressed genes in microarray studies typically assume larger sample sizes than are practical or even possible in some settings.Results: The performance of several probe-level and probeset models was assessed graphically and numerically using three spike-in datasets. Based on the Affymetrix GeneChip, a novel nested factorial model was developed and found to perform competitively on small-sample spike-in experiments.Conclusions: Statistical methods with test statistics related to the estimated log fold change tend to be more consistent in their performance on small-sample gene expression data. For such small-sample experiments, the nested factorial model can be a useful statistical tool. This method is implemented in freely-available R code (affyNFM), available with a tutorial document at http://www.stat.usu.edu/~jrstevens. © 2010 Stevens et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stevens, J. R., Bell, J. L., Aston, K. I., & White, K. L. (2010). A comparison of probe-level and probeset models for small-sample gene expression data. BMC Bioinformatics, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-281

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free