Intravenous-oral itraconazole versus oral posaconazole in preventing invasive fungal diseases for acute leukemia patients

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Invasive fungal diseases (IFDs) are major and lethal infectious complications for patients with neutropenia after chemotherapy. Prophylaxis with intravenous and oral suspended itraconazole (200 mg Q12h intravenously × 2 days followed by 5 mg/kg·d orally in twice) or oral suspension of posaconazole (200 mg Q8h) was administered for preventing IFDs. The only 2 episodes of proven IFDs were not included after propensity-score matching (PSM), while the incidence of possible IFDs was 8.2% (9/110) in itraconazole group and 1.8% (2/110) in posaconazole group, respectively (P =.030). In clinical failure analysis, the failure rate of posaconazole group was lower as compared to the itraconazole group (2.7% vs 10.9%, P =.016). Both intravenous-oral itraconazole and posaconazole suspension are effective in preventing IFDs, while posaconazole suspension seems more tolerable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, L., Pei, X., Ma, R., He, Y., Zhang, R., Wei, J., … Feng, S. (2023). Intravenous-oral itraconazole versus oral posaconazole in preventing invasive fungal diseases for acute leukemia patients. Blood Science, 5(2), 106–110. https://doi.org/10.1097/BS9.0000000000000155

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free