Validation of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory Observational (CMAI-O) tool

32Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: Behaviours associated with agitation are common in people living with dementia. The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) is a 29-item scale widely used to assess agitation completed by a proxy (family carer or staff member). However, proxy informants introduce possible reporting bias when blinding to the treatment arm is not possible, and potential accuracy issues due to irregular contact between the proxy and the person with dementia over the reporting period. An observational measure completed by a blinded researcher may address these issues, but no agitation measures with comparable items exist.Design: Development and validation of an observational version of the CMAI (CMAI-O), to assess its validity as an alternative or complementary measure of agitation.Setting: Fifty care homes in England.Participants: Residents (N = 726) with dementia.Measurements: Two observational measures (CMAI-O and PAS) were completed by an independent researcher. Measures of agitation, functional status, and neuropsychiatric symptoms were completed with staff proxies.Results: The CMAI-O showed adequate internal consistency (α =.61), criterion validity with the PAS (r =.79, p =

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Griffiths, A. W., Albertyn, C. P., Burnley, N. L., Creese, B., Walwyn, R., Holloway, I., … Surr, C. A. (2020). Validation of the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory Observational (CMAI-O) tool. International Psychogeriatrics, 32(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610219000279

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free