Collaborative research as an approach to foster teacher development, teachers’ production of knowledge and changes in school practices

3Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Collaborative research carried out by four researchers from the School of Education of the University of São Paulo, Brasil, and 22 teachers from a public secondary school that prepares teachers for primary grades. This 4-year case study aimed to promote professional growth and to facilitate the building up of a critical teaching community, in an educational environment characterised by strong bureaucracy, central decisions, very low salaries and apathetic students, who will be teachers in the first grades, where we find high rates of retention and drop out. This text shows 2 years of partnership. The schoolteachers started questioning the school practices. To deepen their understanding, they developed investigative projects in which they engaged the students. They systematised and wrote down all this process, and presented it in an educational research meeting. This experience of detachment, systematisation and professional valorisation brought personal growth and professional commitment. Teachers enrolled themselves in systematic studies, started participating in union and professional groups, and are constructing better and more productive relationship with their students. The group is just beginning to create and test curriculum activities, but it faces strong difficulties: job instability, conflict relationships with the administrative staff, deficiencies in the pre-service formation and lack of instructional resources in the school. © 1999, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garrido, E., Pimenta, G. S., Moura, O. M., & Fusari, M. F. R. (1999). Collaborative research as an approach to foster teacher development, teachers’ production of knowledge and changes in school practices. Educational Action Research, 7(3), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650799900200097

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free