Abstract
The most commonly used method to evaluate rainfall excess, is the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) runoff curve number model. This method is based on the determination of the CN value that is linked with a hydrological soil group, cover type, treatment, hydrologic condition and antecedent runoff condition. To calculate the antecedent runoff condition the standard procedure needs to calculate the rainfall over the entire basin during the five days previous to the beginning of the event in order to simulate and then to use that volume of rainfall to calculate the antecedent moisture condition (AMC). This is necessary in order to obtain the correct curve number value. The value of the modified parameter is then kept constant throughout the whole event. The aim of this work is to evaluate the possibility of improving the curve number method. The various assumptions are focused on modifying those related to rainfall and the determination of an AMC condition and their role in the determination of the value of the curve number parameter. In order to consider the spatial variability we assumed that the rainfall which influences the AMC and the CN value does not account for the rainfall over the entire basin, but for the rainfall within a single cell where the basin domain is discretized. Furthermore, in order to consider the temporal variability of rainfall we assumed that the value of the CN of the single cell is not maintained constant during the whole event, but instead varies throughout it according to the time interval used to define the AMC conditions. © 2012 American Institute of Physics.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rianna, M., Orlando, D., Montesarchio, V., Russo, F., & Napolitano, F. (2012). Soil conservation service curve number: How to take into account spatial and temporal variability. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1479, pp. 1792–1795). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4756525
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.