Routine coagulation assays underestimate levels of antithrombin-dependent drugs but not of direct anticoagulant drugs in plasma from patients with cirrhosis

75Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

There is increasing recognition that thrombotic complications may occur in patients with cirrhosis, and literature on antithrombotic treatment in these patients is rapidly emerging. Due to extensive haemostatic changes in patients with cirrhosis, careful monitoring of anticoagulant therapy may be required. Recent data suggest that plasma levels of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) are substantially underestimated by the anti-activated factor X (anti-Xa) assay in patients with cirrhosis. We studied the in vitro recovery of antithrombin (AT)-dependent and -independent anticoagulant drugs in plasma from 26 patients with cirrhosis and 30 healthy controls and found substantially reduced anti-Xa levels when AT-dependent anticoagulant drugs were added to the plasma of patients with cirrhosis. LMWH (0·2 U/ml) had the poorest recovery in plasma from patients with cirrhosis (0·13 ± 0·06 U/ml, compared to 0·23 ± 0·03 U/ml in controls, P < 0·0001), followed by unfractionated heparin and fondaparinux. In contrast, the recovery of rivaroxaban and dabigatran was identical between patients and controls. These data suggest that the anti-Xa assay cannot be used to monitor AT-dependent anticoagulant drugs in patients with cirrhosis, as it substantially underestimates drug levels. The direct factor Xa and IIa inhibitors, however, may be monitored through the respective anti-Xa and anti-IIa assays in patients with cirrhosis. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Potze, W., Arshad, F., Adelmeijer, J., Blokzijl, H., van den Berg, A. P., Porte, R. J., & Lisman, T. (2013). Routine coagulation assays underestimate levels of antithrombin-dependent drugs but not of direct anticoagulant drugs in plasma from patients with cirrhosis. British Journal of Haematology, 163(5), 666–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjh.12593

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free