Voluntary vs. forced financial restatements: The role of board independence

21Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Using a sample of companies that restated their earnings over the period 1997-2002, this study finds that the probability of voluntary as opposed to forced restatements is positively related to the independence of both the board of directors and the audit committee. Following both voluntary and forced earnings restatements, companies increase the proportion of independent directors on both the board and the audit committee; three years after restatements, both types of restating companies attain similar levels of director independence. Moreover, the study finds comparable postrestatement long-run stock performance for all restating and matched companies, which suggests that postrestatement enhancements to internal control systems help restore companies' blemished reputations. © 2009 CFA Institute.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marciukaityte, D., Szewczyk, S. H., & Varma, R. (2009). Voluntary vs. forced financial restatements: The role of board independence. Financial Analysts Journal, 65(5), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v65.n5.5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free