Automation of dry eye disease quantitative assessment: A review

12Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Dry eye disease (DED) is a common eye condition worldwide and a primary reason for visits to the ophthalmologist. DED diagnosis is performed through a combination of tests, some of which are unfortunately invasive, non-reproducible and lack accuracy. The following review describes methods that diagnose and measure the extent of eye dryness, enabling clinicians to quantify its severity. Our aim with this paper is to review classical methods as well as those that incorporate automation. For only four ways of quantifying DED, we take a deeper look into what main elements can benefit from automation and the different ways studies have incorporated it. Like numerous medical fields, Artificial Intelligence (AI) appears to be the path towards quality DED diagnosis. This review categorises diagnostic methods into the following: classical, semi-automated and promising AI-based automated methods.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brahim, I., Lamard, M., Benyoussef, A. A., & Quellec, G. (2022, August 1). Automation of dry eye disease quantitative assessment: A review. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/ceo.14119

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free