Commentary on Mathie RT et al. Method for appraising model validity of randomised controlled trials of homeopathic treatment: Multi-rater concordance study

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Although many researchers agree that applying conventional drug-trial quality criteria to CAM studies lacks plausibility, few take on the burden of devising alternative criteria in a specific area of CAM. This commentary points out strengths and weaknesses in the approach taken in the work of Mathie and colleagues to do this for homeopathy. © 2012 Aickin; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aickin, M. (2012, November 29). Commentary on Mathie RT et al. Method for appraising model validity of randomised controlled trials of homeopathic treatment: Multi-rater concordance study. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-240

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free