AGORA: The END of TREATIES COLLECTIVE DECISION-MAKING in INTERNATIONAL GOVERNANCE

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The traditional treaty, conceived of as a contract between states, is in decline. Recent climate change negotiations have produced nonbinding instruments such as the Copenhagen and Cancun Accords; the financial crisis prompted governments to negotiate Basel III, a nonbinding framework for global banking regulation; the nonbinding Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development's Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises are developed countries' primary rules governing the conduct of transnational businesses. Clouds loom on the horizon even in those areas in which the treaty's prominence continues, such as investment and trade law. The World Trade Organization (WTO) has not reached a major agreement among its members since its founding twenty years ago, and some states have withdrawn from bilateral investment treaties or the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and National of Other States (better known as the ICSID Convention).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meyer, T. (2014). AGORA: The END of TREATIES COLLECTIVE DECISION-MAKING in INTERNATIONAL GOVERNANCE. In AJIL Unbound (Vol. 108, pp. 30–36). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S239877230000180X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free