Experimental comparison of the dynamic evaortor response using homogeneous and slip flow modeling

  • Ryhl Kærn M
  • Elmegaard B
  • Sloth Larsen L
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The dynamic response from an evaporator is important for control of refrigeration and airconditioning systems. Essentially, the prediction of refrigerant charge inside the evaporator is crucial for the dynamic behavior. The prediction of refrigerant charge follows from suitable void fraction correlations from the literature. A chosen set of void fraction correlations (slip flow) and the assumption of homogeneous flow will be investigated in this paper and compared to experiments on a simple coaxial type evaporator. The numerical model of the evaporator is a dynamic distributed mixture model, where different void fraction correlations can be applied. It is shown that the dynamic response of the homogeneous model is too fast, whereas the slip flow models agree well with the experiments. Another difference is that the charge prediction of the homogeneous model is approximately 2-3 times less than the slip flow models. Nomenclature Roman A Cross-sectional area (m 2) c p Specific heat capacity (J kg −1 K −1) D Inner tube outer diameter (m) d Inner tube inner diameter (m) F w Wall friction force (N m −3) G Mass flux (kg m −2 s −1) g Gravitational acceleration (m s −2) ˙ H Enthalpy flow (W) h Specific mixed-cup enthalpy (J kg −1) ¯ h Specific in situ mixture enthalpy (J kg −1) h tc Heat transfer coefficient (W m −2 K −1) ˙ I Momentum flow (N) k Thermal conductivity (W m −1 K −1) M Mass (kg) ˙ m Mass flow rate (kg s −1) P Channel perimeter (m) p Pressure (Pa) ˙ Q Heat flow rate (W) q ′′ w Wall heat flux (W m −2) R Thermal resistance (K W −1) S Slip ratio (-) T Temperature (K) t Time (s) U Velocity (m s −1) ˙ V Volume flow rate (m 3 /s) x Vapor quality (-) z Axial channel length (m) Greek α Void fraction (-) ρ Density (kg m −3) ¯ ρ Mixture density (kg m −3) ρ ′ Momentum density (kg m −3) σ Surface tension (N m −1) θ Angle to horizontal plane (deg.) Subscripts ax Axial b Brine f Saturated liquid g Saturated gas H Homogeneous rad Radial sat Saturation w Wall

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ryhl Kærn, M., Elmegaard, B., & Sloth Larsen, L. F. (2011). Experimental comparison of the dynamic evaortor response using homogeneous and slip flow modeling. In Proceedings from the 8th International Modelica Conference, Technical Univeristy, Dresden, Germany (Vol. 63, pp. 246–255). Linköping University Electronic Press. https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp11063246

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free