P379 Effect of upadacitinib on inflammatory markers and clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn’s disease in the phase 3, U-EXCEL, U-EXCEED, and U-ENDURE studies

Abstract

Background: Improvement in clinical outcomes and normalisation of objective markers of inflammation, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and faecal calprotectin (FCP), are considered treatment targets per STRIDE-II guidelines.1 We evaluated the effect of the oral selective Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib (UPA) on changes in hs-CRP, FCP, and clinical outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). Method(s): In 2 phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled induction studies (U-EXCEL, NCT03345849; U-EXCEED, NCT03345836), patients with moderate-to-severe CD received 12-week treatment with UPA 45 mg (UPA45) once daily (QD) or placebo (PBO). Patients with clinical response to UPA45 were rerandomised in U-ENDURE (NCT03345823) to receive 52-week maintenance treatment with UPA 30 mg QD (UPA30), UPA 15 mg QD (UPA15), or PBO. Endpoints included marker normalisation (hs-CRP < 150) or very soft/liquid stool frequency (SF)/abdominal pain score (APS) (average daily SF = 50% reduction from baseline in marker values with a decrease of at least 100 points in CDAI from baseline. Median changes from baseline in marker levels were also evaluated. Non-responder imputation with no special data handling for missing data due to COVID-19 was used. Result(s): Of 1021 enrolled patients, 645 (63.2%) had elevated hs-CRP (> 5 mg/L) and 750 (73.5%) had elevated FCP (> 250 mug/g) levels at baseline. Significantly greater proportions of patients with elevated baseline marker levels achieved normalisation with UPA compared with PBO at week 12 ( Fig 1A/B) and week 52 (Fig 2A/B; nominal P < .001 for all). Decreases in marker levels from baseline with UPA were observed as early as week 2 and were significantly greater than with PBO through week 12 ( Fig 1C) and week 52 (Fig 2C; nominal P < .001 for all). Patients achieved clinical endpoints and improvements in markers at significantly higher rates with UPA45 vs PBO at week 12 ( Fig 1D-F) and with UPA15 and UPA30 vs PBO at week 52 ( Fig 2D-F; P < .001 for all). The safety profile of UPA in CD was previously reported and no new safety concerns were identified. Conclusion(s): Improvements in clinical endpoints and normalisation of objective markers of inflammation were achieved as early as week 2 with UPA45 induction and sustained with UPA15 and UPA30 maintenance therapy in patients with CD. Median changes in hs-CRP and FCP with UPA support continued improvement of inflammation up to week 52.Copyright © 2023 AGA Institute