Preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is useful for stratifying the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with a low Cancer of the Liver Italian Program score undergoing curative resection

10Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background and Aim: Although the Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) score is useful for prognostication of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a previous study has reported that the CLIP score was unable to stratify the postoperative outcomes of HCC patients in whom the score was low (0-1). Recent studies have reported that the preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) is useful for prognostication of patients with various cancer. Methods: We reviewed 329 HCC patients with a low CLIP score (0-1) undergoing curative resection. This study had the approval of the Institutional Review Board (28068). Multivariate analyses were carried out to detect clinical factors correlating with overall survival (OS). Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used for comparison of OS. Results: Multivariate analysis showed that LMR (<4.35/≥4.35) was significantly associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.022; 95% CI, 1.141-3.583; P = 0.016) as well as portal vein invasion (HR, 2.410; 95%CI, 1.258-4.618; P = 0.008). Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test showed a significant difference in OS and relapse-free survival between patients with high LMR and those with low LMR. Conclusion: Preoperative LMR is useful for stratifying the prognosis of HCC patients with a low CLIP score (0-1) undergoing curative resection.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shimizu, T., Ishizuka, M., Park, K. H., Shiraki, T., Sakuraoka, Y., Mori, S., … Kubota, K. (2019). Preoperative lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio is useful for stratifying the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma patients with a low Cancer of the Liver Italian Program score undergoing curative resection. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery, 3(3), 325–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12251

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free