How Much Does Social Status Matter to Longevity?—Evidence from China's Academician Election

10Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We provide evidence for the causal impact of social status on longevity by exploiting a natural experiment in which subjects undergo a shift in their social status without considerable economic impact. We gather data on 4190 scientists who were either nominated for or successfully elected to the Chinese Academy of Science or of Engineering. Being elected as an academician in China is a boost in social status (vice-ministerial level) with negligible direct economic impact (US$30 monthly before 2009). After correcting for two sources of bias, (1) some potential academicians decease too young to be elected, leading to selection bias in favor of academicians and (2) the endogenous relationship between health and social status, we find that the enhanced social status of becoming an academician leads to approximately 1.2 years longer life. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, G. G., Kwon, O., Xue, X., & Fleisher, B. M. (2017). How Much Does Social Status Matter to Longevity?—Evidence from China’s Academician Election. Health Economics (United Kingdom), 26(3), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.3300

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free