Feeling “Pawsitively” Good: Human–Pet Touch Predicts Subjective Wellbeing

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Although it is known that friendly touch with a trusted individual benefits wellbeing, it remains uncertain whether this holds for touch with a pet and concerns both touch giving and receiving. Thus, we studied in an international sample of pet owners (n = 443) how typical forms of friendly owner- (e.g., stroking) and pet-initiated (e.g., nudging) touch predict owner wellbeing and how somatosensory (touch frequency and duration) and non-somatosensory touch aspects (situational context and following affect) might be relevant. We found a number of positive associations for both owner- and pet-initiated touch. Importantly, however, these associations were for specific forms of touch (i.e., owner stroking, pet nudging) rather than touch more generally and were evident for somatosensory and, to a lesser extent, non-somatosensory variables. Together, these data point to the potential benefits of friendly touch with a pet, while emphasizing the importance of physical and contextual variables in leveraging such touch for human health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schirmer, A., Kaufmann, V., & Cham, C. (2025). Feeling “Pawsitively” Good: Human–Pet Touch Predicts Subjective Wellbeing. Anthrozoos, 38(6), 993–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2025.2520053

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free