Randomized clinical trial of hepatectomy using intermittent pedicle occlusion with ischaemic intervals of 15 versus 30 minutes

32Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The optimal ischaemic interval during hepatectomy with intermittent pedicle occlusion (IPO) remains to be established. The aim of the present randomized clinical trial was to compare the short-term outcome of hepatectomy using IPO with an ischaemic interval of 15 versus 30 min. Methods: Between October 2002 and September 2004, 108 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo hepatectomy without bilioenterostomy were enrolled. During liver transaction, IPO was performed with an ischaemic interval of either 15 min with 5 min of reperfusion (standard group, SG) or 30 min with 5 min of reperfusion (prolonged group, PG). After randomization and subsequent exclusion of certain patients, 44 patients in the SG and 48 in the PG were analysed. Results: The mean(s.d.) bilirubin ratio (serum total bilirubin level on day 2 after operation divided by the preoperative level) was 1·6(0·8) in the SG and 1·7(0·8) in the PG (P = 0·874). The transection area per unit transection time was significantly greater in the latter group (median (range) 1·0 (0·4·2·1) versus 0·8 (0·0·1·5) cm2/min; P = 0·046). Conclusion: There was no difference in the bilirubin ratio when IPO was carried out for 30 or 15 min. By extension of IPO to 30 min, a greater resection area per unit time was possible with preservation of remnant liver function. Copyright © 2006 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Esaki, M., Sano, T., Shimada, K., Sakamoto, Y., Takahashi, Y., Wakai, I. C., & Kosuge, T. (2006). Randomized clinical trial of hepatectomy using intermittent pedicle occlusion with ischaemic intervals of 15 versus 30 minutes. British Journal of Surgery, 93(8), 944–951. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5399

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free