Abstract
In this analysis of the intelligent design theory textbook, Of Pandas and People, I seek a better understanding of how the authors propose intelligent design as a legitimate science. By looking at this text through the rhetorical concept of imitation, I show how the authors attempt to validate the text for uses in public education classrooms. In doing this, the authors of the text attempt to imitate science, scientists and science textbooks, but do so in ways that reveal their teleological position to the scientific and legal community and alienate their creationist progenitors.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Homchick, J. A. (2012). March of the Pandas: Imitation and Intelligent Design. Poroi, 8(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.13008/2151-2957.1109
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.