Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis – ERRATUM (Psychological Medicine (2019) (1-13) DOI: 10.1017/S0033291719001314)

22Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article was published in Psychological Medicine with incorrect author information. MD Inagaki should be Masatoshi Inagaki and MD Stafford should be Lesley Stafford. This has since been updated as per the above.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, Y., Levis, B., Riehm, K. E., Saadat, N., Levis, A. W., Azar, M., … Thombs, B. D. (2020, December 1). Equivalency of the diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-8 and PHQ-9: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis – ERRATUM (Psychological Medicine (2019) (1-13) DOI: 10.1017/S0033291719001314). Psychological Medicine. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291719002137

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free