Seismic performance and cost comparison of concentrically braced frames designed by performance-based plastic design and force-based design method

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Comparative study of 5, 10 and 15 storied steel Concentrically Braced Frames (CBF) designed by Performance Based Plastic Design (PBPD) method and Force Based Design (FBD) method is presented here. The parameters selected for comparison of the frames are (a) Lateral load distribution (b) Design sections of members (c) Seismic performance and (d) Cost. It is observed that the lateral load’s distribution in case of PBPD frames is found more factual. The column sections of PBPD frames are heavier, and brace sections are lighter compared to FBD frames given the fact that PBPD is designed for higher ductility factor. The PBPD method gives a better seismic performance by achieving the predetermined failure mechanism and avoiding total collapse. Taller structures offer cost-effectiveness for PBPD method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dalal, S. P., & Vaidya, K. (2019). Seismic performance and cost comparison of concentrically braced frames designed by performance-based plastic design and force-based design method. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2 Special Issue 6), 997–1001. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1115.0782S619

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free