Comparing 3 mm and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy samples in dogs

1Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether 3 mm cup biopsy forceps (CBF) provide equivalent diagnostic samples to 5 mm CBF for histopathologic diagnosis, bacterial culture, and copper quantification. Study design: Clinical prospective study. Animals: Ten client-owned dogs, presenting for laparoscopic liver biopsy (LLB). Methods: Dogs underwent LLB, and paired samples were collected using 3 and 5 mm CBF. Portal triad and hepatic lobule counts, crush and fragmentation artifacts, copper concentration, bacterial culture results, and agreement on histopathologic diagnosis were compared. Results: Both CBF sizes allowed for easy sample collection and resulted in minimal hemorrhage. An average of 12.13 (confidence limit (CL): 9.4–14.9) and 17.84 (CL: 15.1–20.6) portal triads were obtained using a 3 and 5 mm CBF, respectively (p =.0003). A portal triad count of 11 or more was achieved in 73.3% of the 3 mm and 93.3% of the 5 mm samples. Gwets AC1 coefficient showed a high level of agreement (0.8) for overall histopathologic diagnosis (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Larose, P. C., Brisson, B. A., Foster, R. A., & Monteith, G. (2024). Comparing 3 mm and 5 mm laparoscopic liver biopsy samples in dogs. Veterinary Surgery, 53(4), 742–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/vsu.14006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free