Patient autonomy and advance directives in Korea

27Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

There has been a controversy in Korea regarding a 'death with dignity' in comparison to a 'natural death'. However, the issue of patient autonomy is often overlooked. Decision on withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment should be based on the patients' selfdetermination, prefereably in the form of advance directives. Consensus developed by the National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency is as follows: (1) a doctor should offer a detailed explanation to patients, including about hospice-palliative care and advance directives, (2) when a terminally ill patient expresses reluctance regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation or an artificial respirator in advance, such medical actions can be removed, with basic nutrition supply and pain control maintained. However, more discussions should be made in the case of a patient in "persistent vegetative state".

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heo, D. S. (2009). Patient autonomy and advance directives in Korea. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, 52(9), 865–870. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2009.52.9.865

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free