The use of low-dose mivacurium to facilitate insertion of the laryngeal mask airway

34Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Ninety patients were assigned randomly in a double-blind manner to receive 0.9% sodium chloride, mivacurium 0.04 mg.kg-1 or mivacurium 0.08 mg.kg-1 intravenously, followed by propofol 2.5 mg.kg-1. A laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was inserted 90 s later. The LMA was positioned correctly during the first attempt in 87% of patients and this was not significantly altered by the use of mivacurium. However, mivacurium decreased the incidence of swallowing, coughing, movement and laryngospasm (p < 0.05). LMA insertion was graded as easy in 88% of patients who had mivacurium, compared with 50% in patients who had propofol alone (p < 0.05). The conditions during LMA insertion were similar after 0.04 or 0.08 mg.kg-1 of mivacurium. Patients were apnoeic for a mean (SD) time of 0.67 (0.72) min after propofol alone, compared with 1.72 (1.06) min and 3.05 (1.36) min in patients who also received mivacurium 0.04 and 0.08 mg.kg-1, respectively (p < 0.01). Patients who received mivacurium had a lower incidence of postoperative sore throat (24-30% vs. 53%) (p < 0.05). In conclusion, low-dose mivacurium facilitates LMA insertion and decreases the incidence of postoperative sore throat.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chui, P. T., & Cheam, E. W. S. (1998). The use of low-dose mivacurium to facilitate insertion of the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia, 53(5), 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00321.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free