A bayesian measure of the probability of false discovery in genetic epidemiology studies

395Citations
Citations of this article
223Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In light of the vast amounts of genomic data that are now being generated, we propose a new measure, the Bayesian false-discovery probability (BFDP), for assessing the noteworthiness of an observed association. BFDP shares the ease of calculation of the recently proposed false-positive report probability (FPRP) but uses more information, has a noteworthy threshold defined naturally in terms of the costs of false discovery and nondiscovery, and has a sound methodological foundation. In addition, in a multiple-testing situation, it is straightforward to estimate the expected numbers of false discoveries and false nondiscoveries. We provide an in-depth discussion of FPRP, including a comparison with the q value, and examine the empirical behavior of these measures, along with BFDP, via simulation. Finally, we use BFDP to assess the association between 131 single-nucleotide polymorphisms and lung cancer in a case-control study. © 2007 by The American Society of Human Genetics. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wakefield, J. (2007). A bayesian measure of the probability of false discovery in genetic epidemiology studies. American Journal of Human Genetics, 81(2), 208–227. https://doi.org/10.1086/519024

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free