Management of seizures in the elderly: A survey of UK geriatricians

16Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The incidence and prevalence of epilepsy increase substantially with old age. Despite this, the investigation and management of this patient population remains a grey area. Four hundred and eleven (53%) consultant geriatricians responded to a questionnaire exploring their approach to seizures in the elderly in order to establish an overview of current clinical practice. Between one and five patients presenting with seizures, predominantly aged between 75-85 years, were reviewed monthly. Seventy per cent of geriatricians undertook to investigate the patients themselves with biochemical and haematological profiles performed by most. Electroencephalography and computerized tomographic scanning were routinely requested by a quarter of responders. Only 58% would themselves initiate therapy with antiepileptic drugs, with 16% of consultants starting treatment following the first seizure, 59% after a second and 5% after a third. Phenytoin was first choice for generalized tonic-clonic seizures with carbamazepine preferred for partial seizures. If good control was not obtained, 67% would substitute another first line drug, while 27% would add in a second. Less than 3% would use the new anticonvulsants lamotrigine or vigabatrin. Sixty per cent monitored anticonvulsant concentrations in patients with poor control or suspected toxicity. A wide variability was seen in the current approach to seizures in the elderly, which reflects a lack of established practice. Epilepsy clinics for the elderly would encourage structured research into the many unanswered questions affecting the care of older people with seizures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stolarek, I. H. S., Brodie, A. F., & Brodie, M. J. (1995). Management of seizures in the elderly: A survey of UK geriatricians. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 88(12), 686–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107689508801209

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free