The limits of weaponised interdependence after the Russian war against Ukraine

8Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The idea of weaponised interdependence has led many to believe that Russia would not invade Ukraine due to the high costs of sanctions, including through the Western-backed SWIFT system of financial payments. Although Russia’s economy has been facing shortcomings, the Russian leadership thrived in part due to connections beyond the West. This article argues that scholars have missed the fact that, more than being interdependent with the West, rising states have been decoupling from the United States and the European Union. Emerging powers, particularly China and Russia, have expanded their trade network and built their own financial infrastructure. Those transformations call for a less Western-centric International Relations (IR) scholarship. Scholars should furthermore not only focus on theories of Neoliberal Institutionalism, but also consider contributions from Realism and Marxism to International Political Economy (IPE).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodrigues Vieira, V. G. (2023). The limits of weaponised interdependence after the Russian war against Ukraine. Contemporary Security Policy, 44(4), 642–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2023.2256065

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free