Measuring family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: The development of a questionnaire and preliminary results

213Citations
Citations of this article
181Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To develop and test the feasibility of administering a questionnaire to measure family members' level of satisfaction with care provided to them and their critically ill relative. Materials and Methods: To develop the questionnaire, existing conceptual frameworks of patient satisfaction, decision making, and quality of end-of-life care were used to identify important domains and items. We pretested the questionnaire for readability, clarity, and sensibility in 21 family members and 16 professionals. To assess validity, we measured the correlation between satisfaction with overall care and satisfaction with decision making. To assess the reliability of the questionnaire, we administered the questionnaire to next of kin of surviving patients on discharge and 7 to 10 days later. Results: Questionnaires were mailed out to 33 family members of nonsurvivors; 24 were returned completed but only 22 (66%) were usable. Twenty-five family members of eligible surviving critically ill patients participated in the test-retest part of this study. Of the 47 respondents, 84% were very satisfied with overall care and 77% were very satisfied with their role in the decision making. There was good correlation between satisfaction with overall care and satisfaction with decision making (correlation coefficient = .64). The assessment of overall satisfaction with care was shown to be reliable (correlation coefficient = .85). Conclusions: This questionnaire has some measure of reliability and validity and is feasible to administer to next of kin of critically ill patients. Copyright © 2002 by W.B. Saunders Company.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heyland, D. K., & Tranmer, J. E. (2001). Measuring family satisfaction with care in the intensive care unit: The development of a questionnaire and preliminary results. Journal of Critical Care, 16(4), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1053/jcrc.2001.30163

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free