Effects of Gestalt Therapy Two-Chair Dialogue on Divorce Decision Making

  • Bea Mackay, Ph.D.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Using Q-methodology, Mackay's (1995) study sought to find empirical support for the three-stage model of the Gestalt two-chair technique and the theory put forth by Greenberg (1979, 1983) and Greenberg, Rice, and Elliot (1993). A structured Q-sort was constructed using the factors of conflict resolution (CR) and the Gestalt concept of contact (C) in a 2×2 factorial design. Each factor was divided into two levels: CR-resolved versus unresolved and C-contact versus interruption of contact. The factors of CR and C were expected to interact before and after successful and unsuccessful therapy for decision making. Eight participants who were ambivalent about staying married performed the Q-sort before and after six sessions of therapy in which the two-chair technique was used as the primary intervention to facilitate their pre-decision making regarding their marriage. Moderate support was found for the three stages of the model: opposition, merging, and integration. When therapy was successful, the factors of CR and C interacted as predicted. When therapy was not successful, the factors of CR and C did not interact as predicted. The factors of CR and C did not interact for individuals who were experiencing a great deal of interruption of contact, indicating there is a possible prestage to the model.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bea Mackay, Ph.D. (2002). Effects of Gestalt Therapy Two-Chair Dialogue on Divorce Decision Making. Gestalt Review, 6(3), 220. https://doi.org/10.5325/gestaltreview.6.3.0220

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free