Artificial intelligence (AI) in biomedical research: discussion on authors’ declaration of AI in their articles title

9Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and its different approaches, from machine learning to deep learning, are not new. We discuss here about the declaration of AI in the title of those articles dealing with AI. From 1990 to 2021, while AI articles in the PubMed increased from 300 to 59,596, the percentage declaring AI in the title describes a U-like-shaped curve: about 30% in early 1990s, less than 13% in 2005–2014, again 30% in 2020–2021. A similar trend was observed for AI in medical imaging. While the initial decline could be due to the establishment of AI methods, the recent increase could be related to the capacity of AI to outperform humans, especially in image recognition, fuelled by the adoption of graphic processing units for general purpose computing. The recent increase may also be due to the relevance of open issues about AI, including the standardisation of methods, explainability of results, and concerns about AI-induced epoch-making transformations: to say “We are using AI” in the title may also reflect these concerns.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sardanelli, F., Castiglioni, I., Colarieti, A., Schiaffino, S., & Di Leo, G. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) in biomedical research: discussion on authors’ declaration of AI in their articles title. European Radiology Experimental, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-022-00316-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free