Why tell asymptomatic children of the risk of an adult-onset disease in the family but not test them for it?

25Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This paper first considers why it is important to give children genetic information about hereditary conditions in the family, which will go on to affect their lives in a salient way. If it is important to inform children that they are at risk for an adult-onset disease that exists in the family, why should they not also grow up knowing whether they actually carry the genetic mutation? Central to this discussion is the importance of the process of disclosure and the environment in which genetic information is divulged. It is concluded that the reasons given for defending disclosure of genetic conditions in the family to children are also important reasons to cautiously defend predictive genetic testing of children for adult-onset diseases.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malpas, P. J. (2006). Why tell asymptomatic children of the risk of an adult-onset disease in the family but not test them for it? Journal of Medical Ethics, 32(11), 639–642. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.015370

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free