Using directed acyclic graphs to guide analyses of neighbourhood health effects: An introduction

96Citations
Citations of this article
306Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Directed acyclic graphs, or DAGs, are a useful graphical tool in epidemiologic research that can help identify appropriate analytical strategies in addition to potential unintended consequences of commonly used methods such as conditioning on mediators. The use of DAGs can be particularly informative in the study of the causal effects of social factors on health. Methods: The authors consider four specific scenarios in which DAGs may be useful to neighbourhood health effects researchers: (1) identifying variables that need to be adjusted for in estimating neighbourhood health effects, (2) identifying the unintended consequences of estimating "direct" effects by conditioning on a mediator, (3) using DAGs to understand possible sources and consequences of selection bias in neighbourhood health effects research, and (4) using DAGs to identify the consequences of adjustment for variables affected by prior exposure. Conclusions: The authors present simplified sample DAGs for each scenario and discuss the insights that can be gleaned from the DAGs in each case and the implications these have for analytical approaches.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fleischer, N. L., & Diez Roux, A. V. (2008). Using directed acyclic graphs to guide analyses of neighbourhood health effects: An introduction. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 62(9), 842–846. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2007.067371

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free