Rethinking ‘left-behind’ places in a context of rising spatial inequalities and political discontent

38Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The term ‘left behind places' refers to post-industrial and rural areas characterised by economic under-performance and decline. This special issue aims to develop a broader understanding of the diverse meanings and manifestations of ‘left behind places'. This editorial provides a review of how ‘left-behind' places have been conceptualised in the literature and introduces the contributions according to four themes: the origins and meaning of the term ‘left behind'; the production of ‘left behind places’ through broader processes of socio-spatial restructuring; (re)conceptualising ‘left behindness' in terms of feelings of embitterment and hope; and, unpacking how local and national actors respond to decline and marginalisation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

MacKinnon, D., Béal, V., & Leibert, T. (2024). Rethinking ‘left-behind’ places in a context of rising spatial inequalities and political discontent. Regional Studies. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2023.2291581

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free