Non-rheumatic annular mitral stenosis: Prevalence and characteristics

54Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: To define the prevalence and characteristics of non-rheumatic annular mitral stenosis (AMS) in a general population as compared with rheumatic mitral stenosis (RMS). Methods and results: Clinical and echocardiographical variables were assessed in 70 patients with mitral stenosis. AMS and RMS patients were age- and gender-matched for the comparison of echocardiographic variables. Thirteen patients (18.5%) had AMS. Arterial hypertension and hypercholesterolemia were more prevalent in AMS (77 vs. 36% and 75 vs. 27%, respectively, P < 0.05). Mitral annulus calcification severity score (2.2 vs. 1.3, P < 0.05) and left ventricular mass (276 ± 73 vs. 209 ± 57 g, P < 0.05) were significantly higher in AMS. Mitral valve area (MVA) was higher and mean gradient was lower (2.25 ± 0.6 vs.1.9 ± 0.6 cm2, 4 ± 1.2 vs. 5.6 ± 3.5 mmHg, P = ns) in AMS. Pressure half-time (PHT) MVA and planimetry MVA had a better correlation in RMS than in AMS patients (r = 0.98 vs. 0.71, P < 0.05). Conclusion: AMS is more frequent than that is assumed and is associated with risk factors for coronary artery disease. AMS is generally mild and PHT may be less accurate for MVA calculation than in RMS. © The Author 2008.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Akram, M. R., Chan, T., McAuliffe, S., & Chenzbraun, A. (2009). Non-rheumatic annular mitral stenosis: Prevalence and characteristics. European Journal of Echocardiography, 10(1), 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jen179

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free