Performance comparison of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and ProbeTec et tests for rapid molecular diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in a low TB/MDR-TB incidence country

2Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the performance of GeneXpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) and ProbeTec ET (PTec-ET) assays in diagnosing extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) in Kuwait. Materials and Methods: We tested nonrespiratory clinical specimens (n = 3,995) collected from 3,995 patients suspected to have EPTB. These included cavitary fluids (n = 2,054), fine-needle aspirate (FNA)/pus/tissue biopsy (n = 1,461), urine (n = 302), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF, n = 118), and others (n = 60). All specimens were processed for acid-fast bacilli (AFB), culture in mycobacteria growth indicator tube 960 system, and nucleic acid detection by Xpert and PTec-ET according to manufacturer's instructions. Results: Of 3,995 specimens, 95 were AFB-positive, 403 were culture-positive, and an additional 86 samples had histopathology suggestive of TB. Using culture as reference, the sensitivity and specificity values were 88.33 and 97.3% for Xpert and 72.95 and 97.80% for PTec-ET, respectively. Although performance of both tests was comparable in AFB-positive samples, Xpert detected significantly more cases in culture-positive samples. Among culture-negative samples, Xpert detected 18 more cases including 16 with histopathological evidence of TB. Lowest positivity was detected for both tests in cavitary fluids. Xpert performed better than PTec-ET in culture-positive FNA/pus/tissue biopsy and CSF samples. Conclusions: Although performance of both tests was suboptimal for AFB-negative/culture-positive samples, Xpert performed better than PTec-ET and also detected more cases of AFB-negative/culture-negative/histopathology-positive samples. PTec-ET was positive in 3, while Xpert was positive in all 6 culture-positive CSF specimens for rapid diagnosis of TB meningitis. Xpert was thus superior to PTec-ET or smear microscopy in rapid diagnosis of EPTB.

References Powered by Scopus

The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data

60350Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rapid molecular detection of tuberculosis and rifampin resistance

1903Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The epidemiology, pathogenesis, transmission, diagnosis, and management of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, and incurable tuberculosis

476Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The Value of GeneXpert MTB/RIF for Detection in Tuberculosis: A Bibliometrics-Based Analysis and Review

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion in a tertiary care hospital of central India: The role of xpert Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampicin

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mokaddas, E., Ahmad, S., & Eldeen, H. (2021). Performance comparison of GeneXpert MTB/RIF and ProbeTec et tests for rapid molecular diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis in a low TB/MDR-TB incidence country. Medical Principles and Practice, 30(3), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1159/000515254

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

60%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

30%

Researcher 1

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 5

45%

Immunology and Microbiology 5

45%

Environmental Science 1

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free