Defining hormesis: Comments on Calabrese and Baldwin (2002)

16Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The definition of hormesis should not include non-scientific judgments as to beneficial or harmful effects. Evaluating the significance of hormesis is a separate issue that ultimately requires risk:risk comparisons, particularly since the evolutionary basis for hormesis appears to be Lamarkian rather than Darwinian. It is arguable whether 'hormesis' is the correct umbrella term for all low-dose exposure responses, in particular those at higher organization levels than single species, or whether it includes arousal responses.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chapman, P. M. (2002). Defining hormesis: Comments on Calabrese and Baldwin (2002). Human and Experimental Toxicology, 21(2), 99–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/0960327102ht218oa

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free