Exploring the configuration space of elemental carbon with empirical and machine learned interatomic potentials

26Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We demonstrate how the many-body potential energy landscape of carbon can be explored with the nested sampling algorithm, allowing for the calculation of its pressure-temperature phase diagram. We compare four interatomic potential models: Tersoff, EDIP, GAP-20 and its recently updated version, GAP-20U. Our evaluation is focused on their macroscopic properties, melting transitions, and identifying thermodynamically stable solid structures up to at least 100 GPa. The phase diagrams of the GAP models show good agreement with experimental results. However, we find that the models’ description of graphite includes thermodynamically stable phases with incorrect layer spacing. By adding a suitable selection of structures to the database and re-training the potential, we have derived an improved model — GAP-20U+gr — that suppresses erroneous local minima in the graphitic energy landscape. At extreme high pressure nested sampling identifies two novel stable structures in the GAP-20 model, however, the stability of these is not confirmed by electronic structure calculations, highlighting routes to further extend the applicability of the GAP models.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marchant, G. A., Caro, M. A., Karasulu, B., & Pártay, L. B. (2023). Exploring the configuration space of elemental carbon with empirical and machine learned interatomic potentials. Npj Computational Materials, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-023-01081-w

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free