Skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding of newborns in a university hospital

15Citations
Citations of this article
82Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the prevalence of skin-to-skin contact (STSC) and breastfeeding (BF) stimulation, as well as the reasons for these practices not to be performed; to identify whether women were given information on these practices along the pre-natal monitoring. Method: A cross-sectional study carried out in a university hospital with 586 women. Data collection was from February to September 2016. Data was collected from patient records and from a questionnaire. A descriptive analysis was performed. Results: Immediately after birth, 60.1% of the newborns (NBs) had STSC, and 44.9% were stimulated to suck at the breast. After primary care, 24.1% had STSC, and 69.3% were stimulated to suck at the breast; 47.7% of the newborns did not have STSC due to their unfavorable clinical conditions; 79.2% of the women were not able to inform the reason why BF was not stimulated; 58.5% of the women had pre-natal guidance about STSC, and 90.8% about BF. Conclusion: Both STSC and BF rates could be improved, in view of the benefits provided by these practices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Campos, P. M., Gouveia, H. G., Strada, J. K. R., & Moraes, B. A. (2020). Skin-to-skin contact and breastfeeding of newborns in a university hospital. Revista Gaucha de Enfermagem, 41(Spe). https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-1447.2020.20190154

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free