Abstract
Three broad and enduring issues have been identified in the professional formation of engineers: 1) the gap between what students learn in universities and what they practice upon graduation; 2) the limiting perception that engineering is solely technical, math, and theory-oriented; and 3) the lack of diversity (e.g., representation of a wide range of people, thought, and approaches toward engineering) and lack of inclusion (e.g., belonging and incorporating different perspectives, values, and ways of thinking and being in engineering) in many engineering programs. Although these are not new challenges in professional formation, these issues are highly complex, interconnected, and not amenable to simple solution. That is, they are wicked problems, which can be best understood and mitigated through design thinking, a human-centered approach based on empathy, ideation, and experimentation [1], as it is a useful perspective for addressing complex and ambiguous issues. Thus, this NSF-funded RFE study utilizes a design thinking approach and research activities to explore foundational understandings of formation and diversity and inclusion in engineering while concurrently addressing three project objectives: 1) To better prepare engineers for today's workforce; 2) To broaden understandings of engineering practice as both social and technical; and 3) To create and sustain more diverse and inclusionary engineering programs.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Zoltowski, C. B., Brightman, A. O., Buzzanell, P. M., Eddington, S., Corple, D., Matters, M., & Booth-Womack, V. L. (2020). Using design to understand diversity and inclusion within the context of the professional formation of engineers. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings (Vol. 2020-June). American Society for Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--35461
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.