Blood loss associated with ring uncemented total knee replacement: Comparison between continuous and intermittent suction drainage

22Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In a retrospective comparison of blood loss following uncemented total knee replacement, in which either continuous or intermittent suction drainage was used, measured blood loss was significantly greater with continuous drainage. However, a method of calculating actual blood loss demonstrated no significant difference. With intermittent drainage, more blood remains undetected around the knee joint; this technique should therefore be abandoned in favour of continuous suction drainage. © 1984, The Royal Society of Medicine. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wittmann, F. W., & Ring, P. A. (1984). Blood loss associated with ring uncemented total knee replacement: Comparison between continuous and intermittent suction drainage. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 77(7), 556–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107688407700706

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free