Making sense of Piketty’s ‘fundamental laws’ in a Post-Keynesian framework: The transitional dynamics of wealth inequality

18Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

If Piketty’s main theoretical prediction (r > g leads to rising wealth inequality) is taken to its radical conclusion, then a small elite will own all wealth if capitalism is left to its own devices. We formulate and calibrate a Post-Keynesian model with an endogenous distribution of wealth between workers and capitalists which permits such a corner solution of all wealth held by capitalists. However, it also shows interior solutions with a stable, non-zero wealth share of workers, a stable wealth-to-income ratio, and a stable and positive gap between the profit and the growth rate determined by the Cambridge equation. More importantly, simulations show that the model conforms to Piketty’s empirical findings during a transitional phase of increasing wealth inequality, which characterizes the current state of high-income countries: the wealth share of capitalists rises to over 60 per cent, the wealth-to-income ratio increases, and income inequality rises. Finally, we show that the introduction of a wealth tax as suggested by Piketty could neutralize this rise in wealth concentration predicted by our model.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ederer, S., & Rehm, M. (2020). Making sense of Piketty’s ‘fundamental laws’ in a Post-Keynesian framework: The transitional dynamics of wealth inequality. Review of Keynesian Economics, 8(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.02.04

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free