ArticleOPEN ACCESS

Erratum: Quality of life in sexagenarians after aortic biological vs mechanical valve replacement: A single-center study in China (World Journal of Emergency Surgery (2020) 15 (88) DOI: 10.1186/s13019-020-01143-w)

Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
DOI: 10.1186/s13019-020-01256-2
0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The original article [1] contains two errors in Table 1: 1) The age in Biological AVR group should instead be 65.6 +/− 4.3 2) The age in Mechanical AVR group should instead be 64.8 +/− 5.1

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, L. W., Xu, N., Huang, S. T., Chen, L. W., Cao, H., & Chen, Q. (2020, August 3). Erratum: Quality of life in sexagenarians after aortic biological vs mechanical valve replacement: A single-center study in China (World Journal of Emergency Surgery (2020) 15 (88) DOI: 10.1186/s13019-020-01143-w). Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-020-01256-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free