Dichotomizing rating scale scores in psychiatry: A bad idea?

22Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In psychiatry, the use of rating scales as measures of outcome in clinical trials allows us to generate continuous outcome data, where each individual's outcome is measured in numbers. Continuous outcomes can be divided into two categories, such as improved and not improved, or may be kept continuous. This article briefly presents the main advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches, which are commonly employed in the analyses of rating scale scores in clinical trials and systematic reviews. Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Purgato, M., & Barbui, C. (2013, March). Dichotomizing rating scale scores in psychiatry: A bad idea? Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796012000613

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free