Comparison of 2D vs. 3D U-Net Organ Segmentation in abdominal 3D CT images

3Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A two-step concept for 3D segmentation on 5 abdominal organs inside volumetric CT images is presented. First each relevant organ’s volume of interest is extracted as bounding box. The extracted volume acts as input for a second stage, wherein two compared U-Nets with different architectural dimensions re-construct an organ segmentation as label mask. In this work, we focus on comparing 2D U-Nets vs. 3D U-Net counterparts. Our initial results indicate Dice improvements of about 6% at maximum. In this study to our surprise, liver and kidneys for instance were tackled significantly better using the faster and GPU-memory saving 2D U-Nets. For other abdominal key organs, there were no significant differences, but we observe highly significant advantages for the 2D U-Net in terms of GPU computational efforts for all organs under study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zettler, N., & Mastmeyer, A. (2021). Comparison of 2D vs. 3D U-Net Organ Segmentation in abdominal 3D CT images. In Computer Science Research Notes (Vol. 3101, pp. 41–50). Vaclav Skala Union Agency. https://doi.org/10.24132/CSRN.2021.3101.5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free