Protocol of a meta-analysis: Clinical efficacy and complications of short versus long fusion for the treatment of degenerative scoliosis

4Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of long fusion (LF) versus short fusion (SF) for the treatment of degenerative scoliosis (DS).Methods:We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to collect the randomized and non-randomized controlled studies that compared LF with SF in the treatment of DS from inception to June 1, 2019. The quality of the included studies will be assessed by 2 evaluation members according to the Cochrane collaboration network standard or the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The included studies will be analyzed using RevMan 5 (version 5.3.3).Results and Conclusion:The study will compare the efficacy and safety of LF and SF in the treatment of DS and provide more reliable, evidence-based data for clinical decision making.PROSPERO registration number:CRD42019137646.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, W., Sun, J., Wu, Y., & Yang, L. (2020). Protocol of a meta-analysis: Clinical efficacy and complications of short versus long fusion for the treatment of degenerative scoliosis. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000018845

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free